I've talked a few times about playing drive thru food roulette, where you order, pay, drive away and then open the bag to see what you've received, which is frequently not what you asked for, but what you've come to expect. It seems that I'm not the only one watching.
QSR Magazine, a restaurant trade publication (QSR stands for Quick Service Retail), compiled a list of fast food restaurant accuracy ratings. How they came up with the numbers wasn't disclosed, but I would guess it's along the lines of exit polling, as opposed to driving thru thousands of drive-thru's and ordering millions of dollars worth of grease soaked food and evaluating the accuracy of each order and phoning it in to a breathlessly waiting fast food accuracy score keeper.
Anyway, the results are startling, and like your surprise food purchase, unexpected. Here are selected scores, from best to worst:
#1. Chick-fil-A 97.1%
#2. Culvers 95.2%
#6. McDonald's 94.5%
#8. Burger King 93.6%
#9. KFC 93.4%
#12. Wendy's 92.0%
#13. TacoBell 91.9%
#16. White Castle 90.8%
#21. Dairy Queen 87.4%
#24. Popeyes 84.2%
I tried to discern some meaning from this collection of numbers. We don't have Chick-fil-A in the north, but I have sampled their fare and it's good. Do they have a better system or better people than #2 Culvers? Culvers is generally more costly than most fast food, and it's made to order. Chick-fil-A seems more the traditional grab-one-from-the pile system. Do you like your food piled before it's served? Mashed potatoes excluded. I'm guessing that the Chicklets are trained better and spend a few seconds more verifying that they're grabbing the right stuff, or maybe their average store sales are lower, so they aren't as harried. People ordering fast food are notoriously impatient and frequently less than gracious, so wilting under pressure may be a problem. Culvers has more steps, as the order taker has to get the information correct so that the food is made to the correct order, so there's more opportunity for error.
McD's and the King, locked in a death struggle, like Coke and Pepsi, were two spaces apart. Statistically, one in 20 times your order will be messed up. I have not eaten at McD's and the King, combined, twenty times this year, so I expect to get a hugely screwed up order if I go to either of them soon.
KFC's number is puzzling. It's chicken in a bucket, biscuits in a bag. How do you get this wrong? Do you run down the street and get Whoppers to throw in the bucket, 'cause dang it, you're not perfect!? Or are your customers trumping up the charges because they're nervous from the Colonel's beady little eyes staring at them from the bucket, so they give bad rankings?
Wendy's and Taco Bell were wrong about 8% of the time, or about 1 in 12 trips. I have never had a wrong order from Wendy's, so I believe that there is a group of survey respondents out there trying to discredit the little girl in braids. I am not accusing the King, but he is very creepy. Just sayin'. As for Taco Bell, it's all the same crap presented in different tortillas, so who really knows whether it's right or wrong?
The final three offer answers. White Castle cannot possible get that many orders wrong, and all those people standing in line, half in the bag on Saturday nights, cannot possibly recall the next morning what they ordered or what they actually ate. I think the poor scores are an attempt to avenge the digestive problems that the diners do remember.
Dairy Queen, 87.4%. Nearly 1 in 6 orders incorrect. When they hand you your food at DQ, it's all right there, an ice cream cone or a Blizzard or whatever. Don't accept chocolate if you ordered vanilla--hint: you wanted white and they're trying to give you brown--and they will fix it, or give it to you free, so you can quit giving them bad scores. Yes, I like Dairy Queen. I don't buy actual food there, just Dairy Queen stuff.
Last on the list was Popeyes. Love that chicken from Popeyes? Except when it poisons your whole family, like it did to mine...and their corporate customer service didn't do a goddam thing. We were violently ill for days. "Here you go, sir, 12 pieces, spicy, with the surpise salmonella seasoning..."
I do have a few real questions. First, if you made this many errors in your job, would you not get the boot? Maybe that is how people find their way to work at these restaurants, 'cause they got canned at the nuclear power plant.
Second, if you owned the restaurant--and most of these places are owned by regular people who depend on them to make a living--wouldn't you work your ass off to make sure your people get it right all the time? Mistakes happen, but one of every 6 orders wrong is practically monkey accuracy.
Finally, the vaunted systems of the companies that franchise these brands might need a little tinkering, wouldn't you say?
Imagine how the sign would look: McDonalds--"millions and millions served the wrong stuff"
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Fast Food Roulette
Labels:
Burger King,
McDonalds,
White Castle
NOTA BENE
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Today is Veterans Day
Today is Veterans Day.
A salute to :
Brad
Pete
Grampa
Mike
Uncle Sig
Rick
Ken
and millions more. To add your own, hit the comments link.
Please hit the following link. http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/veteransday.htm
A salute to :
Brad
Pete
Grampa
Mike
Uncle Sig
Rick
Ken
and millions more. To add your own, hit the comments link.
Please hit the following link. http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/veteransday.htm
Monday, November 10, 2008
Half Full or Half Empty?
Five up, five down for the weekend. That's entertainment. Sure ain't profitable, so I'm going with entertainment value.
Syracuse +14 @ Rutgers
Rutgers, 35-17
My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
They didn't.
"L"
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
Wisconsin, 55-20
I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Sagacious, no?
"W"
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
Michigan State, 21-7
This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
It was, they did.
"W"
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Gators, 42-14
FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
It could have been a lot worse for Vandy, judging by the way the Gators rolled 'em up early. Maybe they got bored?
"W"
SanDiego State @ BYU -36 ½
BYU, 41-12
36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
They didn't. This is what happens when you get greedy.
"L"
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise State, 49-14
Boise likes to score a lot of points on the SmurfTurf
Hey, Pete, we gotta bet these early, before the line swings.
"W"
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Pitt, 41-14
Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good
This is happiness.
"W"
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
Michigan 29-6
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game.
HA!
"L"
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
How arrogant of me!
"L"
Baylor @ Texas -26
Texas, 45-21
Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
They had to give up that 4th quarter TD, damn!
"L"
Year to date: 38-40-2. I have been treading water a long time. So, is the glass half full or half empty?
Syracuse +14 @ Rutgers
Rutgers, 35-17
My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
They didn't.
"L"
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
Wisconsin, 55-20
I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Sagacious, no?
"W"
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
Michigan State, 21-7
This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
It was, they did.
"W"
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Gators, 42-14
FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
It could have been a lot worse for Vandy, judging by the way the Gators rolled 'em up early. Maybe they got bored?
"W"
SanDiego State @ BYU -36 ½
BYU, 41-12
36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
They didn't. This is what happens when you get greedy.
"L"
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise State, 49-14
Boise likes to score a lot of points on the SmurfTurf
Hey, Pete, we gotta bet these early, before the line swings.
"W"
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Pitt, 41-14
Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good
This is happiness.
"W"
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
Michigan 29-6
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game.
HA!
"L"
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
How arrogant of me!
"L"
Baylor @ Texas -26
Texas, 45-21
Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
They had to give up that 4th quarter TD, damn!
"L"
Year to date: 38-40-2. I have been treading water a long time. So, is the glass half full or half empty?
Friday, November 7, 2008
STRONG 10 FOR WEEK 10 FOOTBALL
I am almost back to even as we wait for week 10 to kick off. My investing associate, Two Gun Pete, was much chagrined by last week's grand failure. The STP Partners' portfolio, always in tune with the time, suffered its largest single day decline in value since the fund was established in 2002. We have assured ourselves that this is an anomaly and we are prepared to come out firing our way back to prosperity this weekend. We are also considering applying for a federal bailout and giving ourselves a bonus or taking a junket, as everyone else is getting flush this way, and we feel it is only fair that we receive equitable treatment, particularly because we are a diverse organization with magnanimous objectives.
That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Here's this week's outlook:
Syracuse +14 @ Rutgers
The Orangemen come in at 2-6, Rutgers is 3-5. Rutgers is fresh off a bye week that would have been their letdown game, that being the followup to a the 54-34 kick in the Wannie they gave to the Pitt Panthers (the same Panthers who then went out and beat the University of South Bend in an overtime futility battle in which they didn’t cover the spread). Syracuse beat Louisville 28-21 last week, so this should be their letdown game. My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
The Badgers are 4-5, having lost to MSU 25-24 on a last second field goal last week. The week before, Wisconsin pasted the Flighty Illini 27-17. Indiana is 3-6, with their only big win coming courtesy of Northwestern. Wisconsin seems to be improving week by week. Indiana is licking its wounds from last Saturday’s smackdown by Central Michigan, 37-34. I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
The Boilers won 48-42 last week against frustrated Michigan, using an exciting hook and ladder play to score the winning TD as the clock wound down. Sparty enters with an 8-2 record and visions of a major bowl game. Purdue is 3-6 and waiting to bring down the curtain on Joe Tiller’s reign. This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Vandy started off the year hot-hot-hot. They are not-not-not in the same league with the Gators, though they will have their home crowd and fans to surround them this Saturday. The home town folk will witness a beatdown of grand proportion. FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
The Orangemen come in at 2-6, Rutgers is 3-5. Rutgers is fresh off a bye week that would have been their letdown game, that being the followup to a the 54-34 kick in the Wannie they gave to the Pitt Panthers (the same Panthers who then went out and beat the University of South Bend in an overtime futility battle in which they didn’t cover the spread). Syracuse beat Louisville 28-21 last week, so this should be their letdown game. My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
The Badgers are 4-5, having lost to MSU 25-24 on a last second field goal last week. The week before, Wisconsin pasted the Flighty Illini 27-17. Indiana is 3-6, with their only big win coming courtesy of Northwestern. Wisconsin seems to be improving week by week. Indiana is licking its wounds from last Saturday’s smackdown by Central Michigan, 37-34. I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
The Boilers won 48-42 last week against frustrated Michigan, using an exciting hook and ladder play to score the winning TD as the clock wound down. Sparty enters with an 8-2 record and visions of a major bowl game. Purdue is 3-6 and waiting to bring down the curtain on Joe Tiller’s reign. This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Vandy started off the year hot-hot-hot. They are not-not-not in the same league with the Gators, though they will have their home crowd and fans to surround them this Saturday. The home town folk will witness a beatdown of grand proportion. FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
SanDiego State @ BYU -36 ½
BYU is the Cougars, not the Fighting Mormons as I would have had them. SanDiego State is the Aztecs. The Aztec is also the ugliest car ever produced by Pontiac, but I am digressing. Bright yellow is its most hideous rendering for the automotive Aztec, and now I have digressed further. BYU was an early season high flyer, getting derailed by the Horned Frogs of TCU a few weeks back. 36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise likes to score lots of points on the SmurfTurf. I think they will do just that this Saturday against the 2-7 Aggies of Utah State.
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
Baylor @ Texas -26
The Longhorns are going to be very, very angry this weekend after TexTech gutted them last week. Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Oh why, oh why do I do these things???? Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good and this is only their third road game of the year, everything’s ripe for another Wannie screw up…I’m taking Pitt and giving the points anyway. No guts, no glory. No Wannie, no nothin’.
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game. They are plentymuch p.o.’d after Northwestern’s Mike Kafka ran for over 200 yards against them last week. MN would love to trash the Wolverines in the Humpdome to assuage their Land of 10,000 Lakes depression. Another smack in the beezer for Rich Rodriguez.
BYU is the Cougars, not the Fighting Mormons as I would have had them. SanDiego State is the Aztecs. The Aztec is also the ugliest car ever produced by Pontiac, but I am digressing. Bright yellow is its most hideous rendering for the automotive Aztec, and now I have digressed further. BYU was an early season high flyer, getting derailed by the Horned Frogs of TCU a few weeks back. 36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise likes to score lots of points on the SmurfTurf. I think they will do just that this Saturday against the 2-7 Aggies of Utah State.
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
Baylor @ Texas -26
The Longhorns are going to be very, very angry this weekend after TexTech gutted them last week. Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Oh why, oh why do I do these things???? Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good and this is only their third road game of the year, everything’s ripe for another Wannie screw up…I’m taking Pitt and giving the points anyway. No guts, no glory. No Wannie, no nothin’.
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game. They are plentymuch p.o.’d after Northwestern’s Mike Kafka ran for over 200 yards against them last week. MN would love to trash the Wolverines in the Humpdome to assuage their Land of 10,000 Lakes depression. Another smack in the beezer for Rich Rodriguez.
As for the local lads, come Saturday afternoon the Lemont Indians will travel to the ersatz tundra of Gately Stadium, 103rd and Cottage Grove, in the heart of Chicago's scenic south side, to tangle with Morgan Park. My last trip to Gately was when I was a sophomore in high school, as my son is now.
There is no punchline to that bit of anecdotal information, sorry. That is all.
Labels:
Investing,
Investment,
Win Football
NOTA BENE
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Bless You
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to cold and flu season! Today, we shall discuss the common annoyance and aggravation known as "the common cold". How common are they? Adults average 2 or 3 colds per year. Children average 6 to 10 colds per year.
A common cold is caused by a viral infection located in the nose. Children's noses are the major source of cold viruses. I did not make this up. You may verify the information by referring to Viral Infection of Humans: Epidemiology and Control, 4th ed. A.S. Evans, and R.A. Kaslow, editors. I believe these people to be researchers, not anti-childites.
Cold viruses live only in the noses of humans and not in other animals, except chimpanzees and higher primates. I would assume that those of you who have a pack of pet chimpanzees running around the house are therefore susceptible to more colds and spend a lot of time trying to teach your monkees to use Kleenex and giving them chicken soup flavored Purina Monkee Chow.
Point of order: Chimpanzees are apes, monkees are not. I generically refer to bentover hairy creatures with simian faces as monkees (except my old Uncle Carmine, who has taken exception more than once).
How does one catch a cold? The cold virus is deposited in the front of the nasal passages by contaminated fingers (your own, I would imagine, though this was not specified) or from droplets from coughs and sneezes. If you do not wish to catch any more colds, I recommend that you strap on a hazmat mask between November and March. Mind you, I am not an M.D., but I think that it would be fun to see everyone running around with big orange masks trying to talk on their cellphones. There should also be a tube in your mask so you can suck up your Starbucks without exposing yourself to the virus.
When one catches a cold, why does one become a sneezing, hacking, dripping excuse for a human? AH-HAH! Your body's immune system has sounded an alarm: COLD VIRUS DETECTED! Then it sets off to repel the invader by releasing inflammatory mediators. "Inflammatory mediators" is one of those oxymoron terms, as I expect mediators to be non-inflammatory by nature. That, among other reasons, is why I am not, as I have already warned, an M.D. The most famous of the mediators is histamine. It is the most famous because everything we take when we have a cold advertises anti-histamines. If you are going to be anti-anything, you should know why.
The mediators, battling the invading virus, cause dilation and leakage of blood vessels and mucus gland secretion, or more directly, snot and phlegm. No, not the B96 morning team of Snot and Phlegm, but the hock-a-loogie kind. Your body is apparently trying to wash that virus away in a sea of yuck.
"Feed a cold and starve a fever". This is a myth, a myth of proportion equal to the existence of a Republican Party in Cook County. You should eat healthy always, and a cold is no excuse to shovel food into you sneeze port like there was no tomorrow. Some other common misconceptions include :
So, now that you're terrified of the invading virus, how can you minimize the likelihoold of being afflicted? Choose:
A) Consume enormous amounts of vitamin C
B) Wear a garlic necklace and carry a stick to poke at any virus bearers who come near you
C) Pour Robitussin on your Cheerios every Thursday morning
D) Wash your hands frequently
The correct answer is "D", although a regimen of actions A through C will certainly not hurt your chances. Washing your hands frequently will destroy the viruses that you have acquired by touching contaminated surfaces.
You may also wish to toss your chimpanzees in the wash frequently to destroy their viruses, and don't laugh when you see Uncle Carmine.
That is all.
A common cold is caused by a viral infection located in the nose. Children's noses are the major source of cold viruses. I did not make this up. You may verify the information by referring to Viral Infection of Humans: Epidemiology and Control, 4th ed. A.S. Evans, and R.A. Kaslow, editors. I believe these people to be researchers, not anti-childites.
Cold viruses live only in the noses of humans and not in other animals, except chimpanzees and higher primates. I would assume that those of you who have a pack of pet chimpanzees running around the house are therefore susceptible to more colds and spend a lot of time trying to teach your monkees to use Kleenex and giving them chicken soup flavored Purina Monkee Chow.
Point of order: Chimpanzees are apes, monkees are not. I generically refer to bentover hairy creatures with simian faces as monkees (except my old Uncle Carmine, who has taken exception more than once).
How does one catch a cold? The cold virus is deposited in the front of the nasal passages by contaminated fingers (your own, I would imagine, though this was not specified) or from droplets from coughs and sneezes. If you do not wish to catch any more colds, I recommend that you strap on a hazmat mask between November and March. Mind you, I am not an M.D., but I think that it would be fun to see everyone running around with big orange masks trying to talk on their cellphones. There should also be a tube in your mask so you can suck up your Starbucks without exposing yourself to the virus.
When one catches a cold, why does one become a sneezing, hacking, dripping excuse for a human? AH-HAH! Your body's immune system has sounded an alarm: COLD VIRUS DETECTED! Then it sets off to repel the invader by releasing inflammatory mediators. "Inflammatory mediators" is one of those oxymoron terms, as I expect mediators to be non-inflammatory by nature. That, among other reasons, is why I am not, as I have already warned, an M.D. The most famous of the mediators is histamine. It is the most famous because everything we take when we have a cold advertises anti-histamines. If you are going to be anti-anything, you should know why.
The mediators, battling the invading virus, cause dilation and leakage of blood vessels and mucus gland secretion, or more directly, snot and phlegm. No, not the B96 morning team of Snot and Phlegm, but the hock-a-loogie kind. Your body is apparently trying to wash that virus away in a sea of yuck.
"Feed a cold and starve a fever". This is a myth, a myth of proportion equal to the existence of a Republican Party in Cook County. You should eat healthy always, and a cold is no excuse to shovel food into you sneeze port like there was no tomorrow. Some other common misconceptions include :
- a weakend immune system makes you more susceptible to catching a cold, and
- dry air from central heating systems makes you more susceptible and
- catching a chill makes you more susceptible
So, now that you're terrified of the invading virus, how can you minimize the likelihoold of being afflicted? Choose:
A) Consume enormous amounts of vitamin C
B) Wear a garlic necklace and carry a stick to poke at any virus bearers who come near you
C) Pour Robitussin on your Cheerios every Thursday morning
D) Wash your hands frequently
The correct answer is "D", although a regimen of actions A through C will certainly not hurt your chances. Washing your hands frequently will destroy the viruses that you have acquired by touching contaminated surfaces.
You may also wish to toss your chimpanzees in the wash frequently to destroy their viruses, and don't laugh when you see Uncle Carmine.
That is all.
Labels:
catch a cold,
cold,
common cold
NOTA BENE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)