The old ball & chain kicked me right in the self esteem, informing me, with utter disregard for my fragile self, that she skips reading "all that football stuff".
Off topic, I: Professor, make sure your pop wears his sunblock and straw skimmer in Florida!
Off topic, II: I walked into the kitchen early Tuesday morning and Chucky was on my radio with Steve Dahl. Very alarming. Next time I would like to be forewarned.
I began the week with a record of 38-40-2. Here's seven bullets (actually nine, two were fired at earlier games, Central Michigan & Florida) for this week:
Central Michigan +4 1/2 @ Northern Illinois
Northern's second half comeback got them to OT, but CMU QB and Benet HS alumnus Dan LeFevour prevailed, 33-30. We won a thrilla.
"W"
Oklahoma State @ Colorado +16 1/2
Colorado is only 5-5, but they've played a very, very challenging schedule.
Boston College @ Florida State -7
Letdown game for BC and a tear 'em up late in the season game for FSU.
Virginia Tech @ Miami -4
Our on-campus 'Cane says there's big emotion building for this one.
Miami won 16-14, no cover.
"L"
University of South Bend -4 @ Navy
The Manatee is fighting for his life (if you can actually get worried with seven years left on a multi million dollar contract). Even so, I just hate to bet against Navy.
Connecticut -10 @ Syracuse
STP Partners has concluded that 'Cuse has folded its tent.
Mississippi State @ Alabama -19
Remember how Keith Jackson would snap off his words, he of the precise diction: Al-a-BAMMA!
South Carolina +21 @ Florida
21 is a lot, we usually give in these situations. This week we get.
USC -23 @ Stanford
Pete Carroll has begun to unleash the hounds.
Three games below grade, still, as week eleven begins. Like Harry Callahan asked, "...do I feel lucky..."
Friday, November 14, 2008
My Wife Doesn't Read These: Football Week 11
Labels:
football picks,
Manatee
NOTA BENE
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Out With the Scoundrel
Each time that I have witnessed a changing of the guard in the White House, I have experienced a bit of an emotional charge. Watching the exit of the outgoing president and his wife and family (if there was one) has created a little pang of remorse, as I have seen this fellow almost daily for four or more years and he and his loved ones are about to stride off into the sunset. He has devoted years of service to all of us, made decisions popular and not, and become more familiar than almost anyone. If you haven't guessed, I am very, very bad at saying goodbye.
This time around I will have no feeling of remorse, none.
No president in my recall has been more vigorously or cruelly lampooned than George W. Bush. Each president has been the subject of jokes, comedic impressions, political satire and spoofing. None have been ripped with less restraint than has "W".
None has deserved it more.
I love Letterman's film clips of W babbling nonsensically, presented in counterpoint to great oration. Likewise I am thrilled when Frank Caliendo tees it up on Mr. Bush and vilifies the president. I am gratified when just about anyone makes fun of W, tells a joke about him, draws a mean cartoon, anything. This seems a bit irrational, an overreaction perhaps.
I can't help it. George Bush has presided over eight of the most debilitating years that the USA has seen since World War II. No one has been held accountable under his charge. George's mumblespeak and myopic view of the degradation of America's quality of life during his regime are overshadowed only by the dearth of leadership that is the hallmark of his administration. John Kerry's weak opposition in the '04 election is the answer to the "how did he get re-elected" question. The legacy of W's presidency is certain to be unkind at best.
There was a short feature on TV about wecoming president-elect Obama to the White House. I watched W reminisce about how he had met with Bill Clinton eight years ago, saying he'd even called Bill to chat about it. Arrogant turd, we're drowning out here in the backwash of your incompetency while you're dreamily reminiscing!
So when George and Laura toss the keys to 1600 Pennsylania Avenue to the Obama family, I will be pleased to see him go. If the new president had to buy the White House, he'd be getting a deal on devalued real estate but he'd have trouble getting credit. W has left us something by which to remember the Bush presidency, that being the mountain of debt that you and I and our kids and their kids will be grappling with for decades to come.
This time, I have no trouble with good-bye.
This time around I will have no feeling of remorse, none.
No president in my recall has been more vigorously or cruelly lampooned than George W. Bush. Each president has been the subject of jokes, comedic impressions, political satire and spoofing. None have been ripped with less restraint than has "W".
None has deserved it more.
I love Letterman's film clips of W babbling nonsensically, presented in counterpoint to great oration. Likewise I am thrilled when Frank Caliendo tees it up on Mr. Bush and vilifies the president. I am gratified when just about anyone makes fun of W, tells a joke about him, draws a mean cartoon, anything. This seems a bit irrational, an overreaction perhaps.
I can't help it. George Bush has presided over eight of the most debilitating years that the USA has seen since World War II. No one has been held accountable under his charge. George's mumblespeak and myopic view of the degradation of America's quality of life during his regime are overshadowed only by the dearth of leadership that is the hallmark of his administration. John Kerry's weak opposition in the '04 election is the answer to the "how did he get re-elected" question. The legacy of W's presidency is certain to be unkind at best.
There was a short feature on TV about wecoming president-elect Obama to the White House. I watched W reminisce about how he had met with Bill Clinton eight years ago, saying he'd even called Bill to chat about it. Arrogant turd, we're drowning out here in the backwash of your incompetency while you're dreamily reminiscing!
So when George and Laura toss the keys to 1600 Pennsylania Avenue to the Obama family, I will be pleased to see him go. If the new president had to buy the White House, he'd be getting a deal on devalued real estate but he'd have trouble getting credit. W has left us something by which to remember the Bush presidency, that being the mountain of debt that you and I and our kids and their kids will be grappling with for decades to come.
This time, I have no trouble with good-bye.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Fast Food Roulette
I've talked a few times about playing drive thru food roulette, where you order, pay, drive away and then open the bag to see what you've received, which is frequently not what you asked for, but what you've come to expect. It seems that I'm not the only one watching.
QSR Magazine, a restaurant trade publication (QSR stands for Quick Service Retail), compiled a list of fast food restaurant accuracy ratings. How they came up with the numbers wasn't disclosed, but I would guess it's along the lines of exit polling, as opposed to driving thru thousands of drive-thru's and ordering millions of dollars worth of grease soaked food and evaluating the accuracy of each order and phoning it in to a breathlessly waiting fast food accuracy score keeper.
Anyway, the results are startling, and like your surprise food purchase, unexpected. Here are selected scores, from best to worst:
#1. Chick-fil-A 97.1%
#2. Culvers 95.2%
#6. McDonald's 94.5%
#8. Burger King 93.6%
#9. KFC 93.4%
#12. Wendy's 92.0%
#13. TacoBell 91.9%
#16. White Castle 90.8%
#21. Dairy Queen 87.4%
#24. Popeyes 84.2%
I tried to discern some meaning from this collection of numbers. We don't have Chick-fil-A in the north, but I have sampled their fare and it's good. Do they have a better system or better people than #2 Culvers? Culvers is generally more costly than most fast food, and it's made to order. Chick-fil-A seems more the traditional grab-one-from-the pile system. Do you like your food piled before it's served? Mashed potatoes excluded. I'm guessing that the Chicklets are trained better and spend a few seconds more verifying that they're grabbing the right stuff, or maybe their average store sales are lower, so they aren't as harried. People ordering fast food are notoriously impatient and frequently less than gracious, so wilting under pressure may be a problem. Culvers has more steps, as the order taker has to get the information correct so that the food is made to the correct order, so there's more opportunity for error.
McD's and the King, locked in a death struggle, like Coke and Pepsi, were two spaces apart. Statistically, one in 20 times your order will be messed up. I have not eaten at McD's and the King, combined, twenty times this year, so I expect to get a hugely screwed up order if I go to either of them soon.
KFC's number is puzzling. It's chicken in a bucket, biscuits in a bag. How do you get this wrong? Do you run down the street and get Whoppers to throw in the bucket, 'cause dang it, you're not perfect!? Or are your customers trumping up the charges because they're nervous from the Colonel's beady little eyes staring at them from the bucket, so they give bad rankings?
Wendy's and Taco Bell were wrong about 8% of the time, or about 1 in 12 trips. I have never had a wrong order from Wendy's, so I believe that there is a group of survey respondents out there trying to discredit the little girl in braids. I am not accusing the King, but he is very creepy. Just sayin'. As for Taco Bell, it's all the same crap presented in different tortillas, so who really knows whether it's right or wrong?
The final three offer answers. White Castle cannot possible get that many orders wrong, and all those people standing in line, half in the bag on Saturday nights, cannot possibly recall the next morning what they ordered or what they actually ate. I think the poor scores are an attempt to avenge the digestive problems that the diners do remember.
Dairy Queen, 87.4%. Nearly 1 in 6 orders incorrect. When they hand you your food at DQ, it's all right there, an ice cream cone or a Blizzard or whatever. Don't accept chocolate if you ordered vanilla--hint: you wanted white and they're trying to give you brown--and they will fix it, or give it to you free, so you can quit giving them bad scores. Yes, I like Dairy Queen. I don't buy actual food there, just Dairy Queen stuff.
Last on the list was Popeyes. Love that chicken from Popeyes? Except when it poisons your whole family, like it did to mine...and their corporate customer service didn't do a goddam thing. We were violently ill for days. "Here you go, sir, 12 pieces, spicy, with the surpise salmonella seasoning..."
I do have a few real questions. First, if you made this many errors in your job, would you not get the boot? Maybe that is how people find their way to work at these restaurants, 'cause they got canned at the nuclear power plant.
Second, if you owned the restaurant--and most of these places are owned by regular people who depend on them to make a living--wouldn't you work your ass off to make sure your people get it right all the time? Mistakes happen, but one of every 6 orders wrong is practically monkey accuracy.
Finally, the vaunted systems of the companies that franchise these brands might need a little tinkering, wouldn't you say?
Imagine how the sign would look: McDonalds--"millions and millions served the wrong stuff"
QSR Magazine, a restaurant trade publication (QSR stands for Quick Service Retail), compiled a list of fast food restaurant accuracy ratings. How they came up with the numbers wasn't disclosed, but I would guess it's along the lines of exit polling, as opposed to driving thru thousands of drive-thru's and ordering millions of dollars worth of grease soaked food and evaluating the accuracy of each order and phoning it in to a breathlessly waiting fast food accuracy score keeper.
Anyway, the results are startling, and like your surprise food purchase, unexpected. Here are selected scores, from best to worst:
#1. Chick-fil-A 97.1%
#2. Culvers 95.2%
#6. McDonald's 94.5%
#8. Burger King 93.6%
#9. KFC 93.4%
#12. Wendy's 92.0%
#13. TacoBell 91.9%
#16. White Castle 90.8%
#21. Dairy Queen 87.4%
#24. Popeyes 84.2%
I tried to discern some meaning from this collection of numbers. We don't have Chick-fil-A in the north, but I have sampled their fare and it's good. Do they have a better system or better people than #2 Culvers? Culvers is generally more costly than most fast food, and it's made to order. Chick-fil-A seems more the traditional grab-one-from-the pile system. Do you like your food piled before it's served? Mashed potatoes excluded. I'm guessing that the Chicklets are trained better and spend a few seconds more verifying that they're grabbing the right stuff, or maybe their average store sales are lower, so they aren't as harried. People ordering fast food are notoriously impatient and frequently less than gracious, so wilting under pressure may be a problem. Culvers has more steps, as the order taker has to get the information correct so that the food is made to the correct order, so there's more opportunity for error.
McD's and the King, locked in a death struggle, like Coke and Pepsi, were two spaces apart. Statistically, one in 20 times your order will be messed up. I have not eaten at McD's and the King, combined, twenty times this year, so I expect to get a hugely screwed up order if I go to either of them soon.
KFC's number is puzzling. It's chicken in a bucket, biscuits in a bag. How do you get this wrong? Do you run down the street and get Whoppers to throw in the bucket, 'cause dang it, you're not perfect!? Or are your customers trumping up the charges because they're nervous from the Colonel's beady little eyes staring at them from the bucket, so they give bad rankings?
Wendy's and Taco Bell were wrong about 8% of the time, or about 1 in 12 trips. I have never had a wrong order from Wendy's, so I believe that there is a group of survey respondents out there trying to discredit the little girl in braids. I am not accusing the King, but he is very creepy. Just sayin'. As for Taco Bell, it's all the same crap presented in different tortillas, so who really knows whether it's right or wrong?
The final three offer answers. White Castle cannot possible get that many orders wrong, and all those people standing in line, half in the bag on Saturday nights, cannot possibly recall the next morning what they ordered or what they actually ate. I think the poor scores are an attempt to avenge the digestive problems that the diners do remember.
Dairy Queen, 87.4%. Nearly 1 in 6 orders incorrect. When they hand you your food at DQ, it's all right there, an ice cream cone or a Blizzard or whatever. Don't accept chocolate if you ordered vanilla--hint: you wanted white and they're trying to give you brown--and they will fix it, or give it to you free, so you can quit giving them bad scores. Yes, I like Dairy Queen. I don't buy actual food there, just Dairy Queen stuff.
Last on the list was Popeyes. Love that chicken from Popeyes? Except when it poisons your whole family, like it did to mine...and their corporate customer service didn't do a goddam thing. We were violently ill for days. "Here you go, sir, 12 pieces, spicy, with the surpise salmonella seasoning..."
I do have a few real questions. First, if you made this many errors in your job, would you not get the boot? Maybe that is how people find their way to work at these restaurants, 'cause they got canned at the nuclear power plant.
Second, if you owned the restaurant--and most of these places are owned by regular people who depend on them to make a living--wouldn't you work your ass off to make sure your people get it right all the time? Mistakes happen, but one of every 6 orders wrong is practically monkey accuracy.
Finally, the vaunted systems of the companies that franchise these brands might need a little tinkering, wouldn't you say?
Imagine how the sign would look: McDonalds--"millions and millions served the wrong stuff"
Labels:
Burger King,
McDonalds,
White Castle
NOTA BENE
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Today is Veterans Day
Today is Veterans Day.
A salute to :
Brad
Pete
Grampa
Mike
Uncle Sig
Rick
Ken
and millions more. To add your own, hit the comments link.
Please hit the following link. http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/veteransday.htm
A salute to :
Brad
Pete
Grampa
Mike
Uncle Sig
Rick
Ken
and millions more. To add your own, hit the comments link.
Please hit the following link. http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/generalinfo/a/veteransday.htm
Monday, November 10, 2008
Half Full or Half Empty?
Five up, five down for the weekend. That's entertainment. Sure ain't profitable, so I'm going with entertainment value.
Syracuse +14 @ Rutgers
Rutgers, 35-17
My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
They didn't.
"L"
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
Wisconsin, 55-20
I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Sagacious, no?
"W"
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
Michigan State, 21-7
This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
It was, they did.
"W"
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Gators, 42-14
FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
It could have been a lot worse for Vandy, judging by the way the Gators rolled 'em up early. Maybe they got bored?
"W"
SanDiego State @ BYU -36 ½
BYU, 41-12
36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
They didn't. This is what happens when you get greedy.
"L"
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise State, 49-14
Boise likes to score a lot of points on the SmurfTurf
Hey, Pete, we gotta bet these early, before the line swings.
"W"
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Pitt, 41-14
Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good
This is happiness.
"W"
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
Michigan 29-6
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game.
HA!
"L"
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
How arrogant of me!
"L"
Baylor @ Texas -26
Texas, 45-21
Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
They had to give up that 4th quarter TD, damn!
"L"
Year to date: 38-40-2. I have been treading water a long time. So, is the glass half full or half empty?
Syracuse +14 @ Rutgers
Rutgers, 35-17
My thought is that the Orange can stay inside the points.
They didn't.
"L"
Wisconsin -10 ½ @ Indiana
Wisconsin, 55-20
I’ll take the Badgers and give up the points.
Sagacious, no?
"W"
Purdue @ Michigan State -10
Michigan State, 21-7
This is going to be a tune-up game for Michigan State and the Boilers are gonna get spanked.
It was, they did.
"W"
Florida -24 @ Vanderbilt
Gators, 42-14
FLA likes to humiliate people. Vandy is next in line.
It could have been a lot worse for Vandy, judging by the way the Gators rolled 'em up early. Maybe they got bored?
"W"
SanDiego State @ BYU -36 ½
BYU, 41-12
36 ½ will make this a stretch, but I think the Fighting Mormons have it in them.
They didn't. This is what happens when you get greedy.
"L"
Utah State @ Boise State -32.5
Boise State, 49-14
Boise likes to score a lot of points on the SmurfTurf
Hey, Pete, we gotta bet these early, before the line swings.
"W"
Louisville @ Pittsburgh -6 ½
Pitt, 41-14
Wannie’s rolling, Louisville isn’t very good
This is happiness.
"W"
Michigan @ Minnesota -7 ½
Michigan 29-6
I see this as the Gophers’ rebound game.
HA!
"L"
Penn State -7.5 @ Iowa
Yer kiddin’ me right? Joe’s boys are going to clobber the Hawks, book it.
How arrogant of me!
"L"
Baylor @ Texas -26
Texas, 45-21
Give up the points, lock up the women and children and watch Baylor get destroyed.
They had to give up that 4th quarter TD, damn!
"L"
Year to date: 38-40-2. I have been treading water a long time. So, is the glass half full or half empty?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)